Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 979 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - 196 vs 181 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |