Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3782 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 36% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4130 - 210 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $22.92 vs $147.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i3-13100 - $0.15 vs $0.7 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |