Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3330 - 278 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $111.01 vs $139.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10320 - $0.44 vs $0.5 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 884 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
255
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $111.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 877 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |