Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2796 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 92% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-3330 - 102 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - $99.99 vs $106.51
- Up to 51% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-3330 - $0.98 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
102
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |