Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-530 - 137 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $42.5 vs $99.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10300 - $0.34 vs $0.72 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4151 minutes ago
Buy for $42.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |