Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $89.99 vs $217.97
- Up to 59% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900F - $0.47 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-10105T - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
190
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13986 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
41%
Price, $
$217.97
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $217.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |