Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105T is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 710 vs 705 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $89.99 vs $270.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.13 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 24 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
710
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |