Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 1015 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $83.24 vs $448.75
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-8086K - $0.5 vs $2.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10105F - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
168
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for $448.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |