Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900E outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900E is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900E
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 106 vs 84 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900E - 20 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G6900E
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900E | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
