Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 2006 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $19.25 vs $195.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.04 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G540 - 520 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
503
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14308 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |