Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 280 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $53.55 vs $150.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-9600KF - $0.53 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - 116 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
87.06896551724138%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5522 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
41.08527131782946%
Price, $
$150
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
38.81537492123503%
Multi-Core
1051
18.415980374978098%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |