Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2772 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-950 - 255 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $39.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-950 - $0.15 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |