Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8350 - 158 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than FX-8350 - $39.0 vs $182.02
- Up to 78% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-8350 - $0.25 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |