Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - 206 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than FX-8350 - $140.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - $0.68 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 828 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |