Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $19.65 vs $140.99
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930 - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $19.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Buy for $140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
36.40718562874252%
Multi-Core
1043
18.004488175384083%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |