Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1094 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Pentium G645T - 167 vs 165 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |