Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 548 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $39.9 vs $195.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.21 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 195 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14005 minutes ago
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |