Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1281 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $39.59 vs $174.02
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Buy for $174.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
96.46365422396856%
Multi-Core
825
46.84838160136286%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |