Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2548 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $49.0 vs $479.95
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 25% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1620 - 134 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 48 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Buy for $479.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
24.535092981403718%
Multi-Core
723
5.429150709619283%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |