Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2239 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B830 - 193 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$405
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |