Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2866 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Celeron B830 - 186 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 24 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |