Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2866 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron B830 - 138 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$392.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $392.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7630 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |