Buy on Amazon
$90
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-920 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 1384 days older than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron B830 - 114 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7 Processor i7-920 2.66GHz 8 MB LGA1366 CPU BX80601920
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
