Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1585 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron B830 - 110 vs 102 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |