Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1887 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron B820 - 216 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |