Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1829 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron B815 - 100 vs 95 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |