Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 700 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron B815 - 152 vs 146 FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |