Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 492 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Celeron 847 - 213 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |