Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2866 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 40% better in Minecraft than Celeron 3205U - 814 vs 582 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
