Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1311 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 15 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron 3205U - 129 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 48 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |