Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1730 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 3205U - 136 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 48 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |