Buy on Amazon
$1,075
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $107
Availability
MSRP in USD: $107
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1279 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron 3205U - 175 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD295XA8AFWOF)
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
