Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1962 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 15 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 33% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 3205U - 136 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |