Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 57% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron 1037U - 130 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 20 vs 2 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |