Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3271 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron 1000M - 240 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 24 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |