Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3537 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron 1000M - 237 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7848 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |