Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2284 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 187% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron 1000M - 112 vs 39 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |