Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 466 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 2% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 1000M - 188 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
