In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320E is faster than the Ryzen 7 7700 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $97 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 35% cheaper – $178.02 vs $274.99
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.89 vs $1.62/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 7 7700
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 7700: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$274.99
64%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
55%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 7 7700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 7 7700
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7700 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
