In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320E is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $184 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 51% cheaper – $178.02 vs $362.00
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.89 vs $2.11/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
171 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
86%
Price, $
$362
49%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Aug 15th, 2024 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
