In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320E is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $391 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 69% cheaper – $178.02 vs $569.00
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.89 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$569
31%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
