In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8320E is faster than the Ryzen 5 7600X and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $1 more expensive!
FX-8320E
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 13% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.90 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600X
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 8 years and 25 days newer
- Up to 1% cheaper – $177.00 vs $178.02
- Up to 1% cheaper
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 7600X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
87%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 7600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Ryzen 5 7600X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 5 7600X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
