The Core i9-9900T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-9900T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i9-9900T is better in every way
Core i9-9900T vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Core i9-9900T vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
