Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3056 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $178.02 vs $197.89
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 21% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320E - 329 vs 273 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320E - $0.60 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
329
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.89
89%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |