The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-12600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $60.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-12600KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 34% cheaper – $118.00 vs $178.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8320E vs Core i5-12600KF
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
228
100%
Min 1% FPS
155
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-12600KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $264.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake-S |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
