Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $178.02 vs $289.02
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 67% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 147 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - $1.97 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 24 vs 8 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$289.02
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $289.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |