Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 3332 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of FX-8320E
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $178.02 vs $332.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-14700K - $0.94 vs $1.44 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320E - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
65%
Price, $
$332.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $332.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |