In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is same performance as the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $103 more expensive!
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Core i7-9700F
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 1 year and 7 months newer
- Up to 29% cheaper – $247.30 vs $349.95
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall – $1.15 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$349.95
70%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
71%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
73%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
