In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $135 more expensive!
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 39% cheaper – $214.99 vs $349.95
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
214 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
87%
Price, $
$349.95
61%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
53%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
86%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
69%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
