In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Core i9-7920X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 15% cheaper – $298.98 vs $349.95
- Up to 15% cheaper
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall – $1.20 vs $1.63/FPS
- Up to 26% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
214 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
87%
Price, $
$349.95
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
74%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
55%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
